No, That Putin Video Didn’t Use a Green Screen

It’s just bad video compression.

Mikhail Klimentyev/Sputnik via AP

Facts matter: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter. Support our nonprofit reporting. Subscribe to our print magazine.

On Saturday afternoon, Reddit’s top-performing post claimed that Russian leader Vladimir Putin was green-screened into a video. It was later deleted and flagged by moderators as “misinformation”—but casual viewers could be forgiven for believing the juicy claim alleged by the post title: “Green screen detected!”

Putin’s hand appears to pass through the stem of a microphone in the low-resolution video posted to Reddit. When evaluating videos featuring the Russian leader, it must be noted that Russia has a history of producing propaganda and staged or fabricated video—including video purportedly used to justify its recent invasion of Ukraine. Earlier this week, Putin effectively banned independent journalism in the country and blocked access to Facebook and prominent foreign news sites in a move towards cementing the Kremlin—and its state-run media—as the primary source of information for Russian citizens. And with much of the West united against Russia, “gotcha!” claims like this are especially clickable.

But compare this particular clip side-by-side to a higher resolution version posted on YouTube, and the culprit is as obvious as it is harmless: run-of-the-mill video compression.

I won’t get into the ins and outs of video compression here—that’s a topic for another post. But here’s the short version: Each time a video is uploaded (like to YouTube, Twitter, or Instagram) or sent through a messaging service (like WhatsApp, Apple Messages, or good ol’ fashioned texts) it loses quality. This is called “generation loss.” Think back to the childhood game of telephone: After being repeated by many people, the original message gets muddled.

That’s what appears to have happened here—and it’s far from the first time. It’s just the latest example of a growing “green screen panic” that has led social media users, skeptics, conspiracy theorists, and yes, even journalists, to allege that visual quirks in videos released by politicians or governments are signs of outright fabrication. Think back to March 2021, when Joe Biden’s hand passed near a microphone and sparked unfounded claims that he was digitally inserted into the video with a green screen. Or in October 2020, when Donald Trump released videos that prompted similarly false—yet widespread—claims that he used a green screen.

We know that false news spreads faster than the truth. When an information war is at play, we’re not just bystanders—we’re part of the effort, willingly or not.

Update March 6: As the false “Putin green screen” claims continue to spread online, there’s a new twist: viral posts inaccurately suggest that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy responded to the Putin video in an effort to troll the Russian leader by deliberately pushing his own microphone at the end of a televised address. According to BBC disinformation reporter Shayan Sardarizadeh, the Zelenskyy video was recorded on Friday, the day before the Putin video was disseminated.

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate